HTP_ErnieB wrote:I agree 100%. The milquetoast moderating techniques currently being employed also leave much to be desired. I mean, what's the point of just deleting the opening offending post when the entire thread should be deleted? Why preface required actions with an apologetic disclaimer before doing almost nothing anyway? I am serious about supporting you to be a mod because I know from experience you'd deal with current situations with more vim and vigor than the current crew. I am equally serious when I stated it's less fun to be a zookeeper, I think you already know that.
wow Ernie.. i didnt know i was so below your expectations
milquestoast no less.... here i thought i was just trying to keep things running smooth~
much to be desired? well if that's the general feeling (thanks to Crissy for the support) i'll be the first to step forward and offer my resignation to Mark...and let someone else tend the 'zoo'
whats the point of deleting JUST the offending link? in mind many follow up comments have been enjoyably humoress, or instructive or educational for additional reference as to solutions.
"prefacing with apologies" is all about keeping people informed. i dont care for heavy handed dictator type decisions, so i like people to know where i'm coming from and besides this is YOUR board, i'm just here to delete the offensive posts.. and have everyone aimed in the same positive direction.
'more vim and vigor'.. you mean like explaning more? telling people why you are locking a thread? or do you mean just deleting/locking without any explanation in a more aggressive fashion. i'm not sure i understand how more vim/vigor can be applied to a role that i view more as an umpire in a game... you know, they are best doing their job when you dont know they're there.
but as i said, if that's not good enough, or if someone thinks they can do better, hey my horse isnt' so high to climb down from
be happy to step aside~
let me know?